Legal principle
Ai senses of the combined provisions of the articles 42, 43 e 819-ter, co. 1, cod. Proc. Civ., The only half appeal available for contest the pronunciation of the first judge that has denied the own competence, per being the controversy donated ad referees, or limited per chief that has it has affirmed the own competence, is the regulation of competence, the appeal being admissible only in the case in it is pecked also the decision on the merit.
Methodological notes
standard
Decision text and analysis
Ai+senses+of the+combined+provisions+of the+articles+42,+43+e+819-ter,+co.+1,+cod.+Proc.+Civ.,+The only+half+appeal+available+for+contest+the+pronunciation+of the+first+judge+that has+denied+the+own+competence,+per+being+the+ controversy+donated+ad+referees,+or+limited+per+chief+that has+it has affirmed+the+own+competence,+is+the+regulation+of+competence,+the appeal+being+admissible+only in the+case+in++it is+pecked+also+the+decision+on the+merit.
How to cite
Cassazione — VI Civ., 6 March 2020, No. 6496, «Supreme Court, 6 March 2020, n. 6496», in Arbitration in Italy, https://www.arbitratoinitalia.it/en/decisione/supreme-court-6-march-2020-n-6496-en-1752192698/