Arbitration case law

ordinanza

Supreme Court, 6 March 2020, n. 6496

Cassazione — VI Civ.

Legal principle

Ai senses of the combined provisions of the articles 42, 43 e 819-ter, co. 1, cod. Proc. Civ., The only half appeal available for contest the pronunciation of the first judge that has denied the own competence, per being the controversy donated ad referees, or limited per chief that has it has affirmed the own competence, is the regulation of competence, the appeal being admissible only in the case in it is pecked also the decision on the merit.

Methodological notes

standard

Decision text and analysis

Ai+senses+of the+combined+provisions+of the+articles+42,+43+e+819-ter,+co.+1,+cod.+Proc.+Civ.,+The only+half+appeal+available+for+contest+the+pronunciation+of the+first+judge+that has+denied+the+own+competence,+per+being+the+ controversy+donated+ad+referees,+or+limited+per+chief+that has+it has affirmed+the+own+competence,+is+the+regulation+of+competence,+the appeal+being+admissible+only in the+case+in++it is+pecked+also+the+decision+on the+merit.

How to cite

Cassazione — VI Civ., 6 March 2020, No. 6496, «Supreme Court, 6 March 2020, n. 6496», in Arbitration in Italy, https://www.arbitratoinitalia.it/en/decisione/supreme-court-6-march-2020-n-6496-en-1752192698/

Share this decision