Court of Bolzano, 6 March 2020, n. 267

Where the clause compromise expressly provides that the referee decides "as referee irrital", not can that are to be considered the nature ironte of the praise, applying the rule interpretative rule in claris non fit interpret. This the the correct int at Erpration of the will of the parts not can in no case being sought ignored from a exegesis textual, the which only if necessary, it must be integrated with a analysis of the behavior of the parts (E not of third parts parts, as the referees).