Arbitration and insolvency

In insolvency¬†matters, Italian law does not favour arbitration. On the one hand, the vis attractiva concorsus principle pursuant to article 24(1) of the Italian¬†Insolvency¬†Law¬†states that ‚Äúthe Court which opens the insolvency proceedings¬†shall have jurisdiction on¬†all the civil actions¬†resulting from such proceedings.‚ÄĚ On the other hand, Article 83/bis of the Italian Insolvency Law¬†notes that ‚Äúif a contract containing an arbitration clause is terminated in accordance with the provisions of this Section, the pending arbitration proceedings shall not continue.” The interaction between both Articles results in a significant reduction of the scope of the arbitrability of the disputes a party to which is subject to insolvency proceedings. And this reduction also interferes with the principle of¬†separability of the arbitration clause. ¬†Indeed, the explanatory memorandum to the decree introducing the comprehensive reform of the Italian Insolvency Law states that “(…) the already pending arbitration proceedings shall not continue if¬†the contract containing the arbitration clause is terminated¬†pursuant to the provisions of section IV. The purpose¬†is to prevent that the arbitration proceedings survives the agreement, terminated as a consequence of the bankruptcy, which contained the arbitration clause.‚Ä̬†

A recent order of the Supreme Court sitting en banc (order no. 10800 of 26 May 2015, Italian text available here) concerns the relationship between arbitration (in the case at hand, international arbitration) and insolvency proceedings.

The case may be summarised as follows.

In 2007, an airline company and an airport management company entered into a service contract, which contained an arbitration clause. According to this clause, all disputes arising between the parties would have to be referred to arbitration under the rules of the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA).

Once the agreement expired, the airport management company (in the meantime admitted to a pre-bankruptcy) requested, and was granted a European order for payment, issued by an Italian Court. However, the air transport company appealed the order, first of all, objecting to the jurisdiction of the Italian Courts, since the parties had agreed upon the referral of all their disputes to a foreign arbitration. During the appeal proceedings, the airport management companies went bankrupt. The proceedings were then reinstated and, finally, the air transport company referred the case to the Supreme Court, so as to have a final decision on the issue of jurisdiction.

The Supreme Court’s ruling is interesting under many points of view.

First of all, the Court analysed the objection raised by the bankruptcy’s receiver, whereby¬†the arbitration clause at hand provided for the referral¬†to¬†an “arbitrato irrituale” (i.e., an alternative arbitration procedure which does not result in¬†an enforceable award and does not give rise to jurisdictional issues). ¬†To this respect, the Supreme Court held – following its own case law¬†– that “international arbitration can only be arbitrato rituale” (i.e., the regular arbitration procedure resulting in an enforceable award), since “the distinction between arbitrato rituale¬†and arbitrato irrituale, is well known to the existing law [as well as the Italian Code of Civil Procedure], but is rarely applied abroad.”¬†

Moreover, the Supreme Court used¬†a strict construction¬†of Article 83/bis of the Italian Insolvency Law. To this respect, the Court ruled that “(…) we cannot draw a general rule, whereby arbitration proceedings cannot continue, from Article 83/bis of the¬†Insolvency Law. However, the opposite rule may also be drawn. Indeed, the above mentioned Article¬†(…) states that the arbitration clause is terminated in the case governed by it (that of pending arbitration proceedings and the termination¬†of the contract¬†containing the arbitration clause pursuant to¬†Article 72 of the Insolvency Law). On the basis of the same provision, we must conclude that, if the bankruptcy’s receiver avails himself of the rights arising out of the contract containing the arbitration clause, this clause is binding on him. Otherwise, the receiver would be allowed to terminate only certain clauses of the agreement, while claiming the fulfillment¬†of¬†other clauses of the same agreement (…).” The Supreme Court sitting en banc¬†added, then, that “it does not matter¬†that the agreement had expired and had not been renewed at the time of the appeal of the payment¬†order. Indeed, the purpose of the arbitration clause is to settle the disputes arising out of the agreement, in accordance with the proceeding laid down therein.”¬†

Another interesting issue arose from the fact that in the LCIA arbitration proceedings the aviation company brought¬†a counterclaim against the bankrupt¬†company. In the opinion of the bankruptcy’s receiver, the Arbitral Tribunal did¬†not have jurisdiction on that counterclaim¬†(in fact, according to the decision¬†no. 9070 of 6 June 2003 of the Supreme¬†Court “the jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal, arising from the arbitration clause, is in any case (…) prevented¬†by the opening of the insolvency proceedings. Indeed, as a consequence thereof, the claims against the bankrupt debtor shall be determined by the Insolvency Court, which sole has jurisdiction on them.” )

In the ruling at hand, the Supreme Court partially weakened the principle¬†of vis attractiva concursus and reaffirmed the Kompetenz-Kompetenz principle. More specifically, the Court stated: “this Court is prevented from deciding on the jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal on the counterclaim (…) concerning the alleged credit towards¬†the bankrupt debtor. Indeed, once excluded the jurisdiction of the Italian Courts, as a result of the arbitration clause which referred the dispute to a foreign Arbitral Tribunal, it is on the Arbitral Tribunal to determine the rules governing the arbitration procedure.‚Ä̬†

We will probably read another decision on this case, when the recognition of the LCIA award is sought in Italy.

The official abstract of the ruling at hand¬†is less than clear-cut, not least because it focuses on a portion of the order, which does not represent the rationale of the decision. In any case, the official abstract is the following: “If an agreement stipulated before the opening of the insolvency procedure involving one of the parties thereto contains an arbitration clause (in the case at hand, an international arbitration clause), the office held by the Arbitral Tribunal is not subject to termination pursuant to¬†Article 78 of Insolvency Law. Indeed, all the involved parties granted the Arbitral Tribunal with the relevant powers. This construction is indirectly confirmed by Article 83/bis of the Insolvency Law, which states that if arbitration proceedings may not continue because of the termination¬†of the agreement containing the arbitration clause, it must be held that the clause is effective and binding if¬†the bankruptcy’s receiver does not terminate the agreement containing it: indeed, the receiver is not allowed to only terminate certain clauses and at the same time claim the¬†fulfillment of other clauses” (Supreme Court sitting en banc, order no. 10800 of 26 May 2015, official abstract no. 635360).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Browsing this website you accept the use of cookies. more info

The following information is provided in accordance with Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 679/2018 ("GDPR"), to users who access the services available at (‚ÄúSite‚ÄĚ). When consulting the Site, information concerning users may be collected that constitutes personal data under the Privacy Code. This information is provided exclusively for the Site and does not affect any other web sites accessible by the user through links provided on the same.
Data Controller (Titolare del trattamento) is Arbitration in Italy Ltd, a company incorporated under English law, registered at No. 12459814, with registered office in 61 Bridge Street, Kington, HR5 3DJ, UK ("Company"). Data Processor (Responsabile del trattamento) is the Company's present legal representative.
The processing of data related to the web services on this Site is carried out at the premises of the Company set out above and is performed by internal personnel duly appointed as Persons in charge of processing (Incaricati del trattamento).
Surfing Data
During the normal operation, the computer systems and software procedures used to operate the Site acquire some personal data whose transmission is implicit in the communication protocols of the Internet. This information is not collected to be associated with identified persons, but by its very nature could, through processing and association with data held by third parties, allow identification of users. This category of data includes IP addresses or domain names of computers used by users who connect to the Site, URI (Uniform Resource Identifier) of requested resources, the time of the request, the method used to submit the request to the server, the size of the file obtained in reply, the numerical code indicating the status of the response from the server (successful, error, etc.) and other parameters regarding the operating system and computer environment. These data are used only to obtain statistical information about the site and its use and to check its correct functioning and are deleted immediately after processing. The data could be used to ascertain responsibility in the event of possible computer crimes committed against the Site: except in this case, the data on web contacts are kept for a maximum period of seven days.
Data provided voluntarily by the user
The sending of optional, explicit and voluntary e-mails to addresses shown on this Site, and the filling in of forms specifically provided involve the subsequent acquisition of the sender’s e-mail address and the additional personal data provided in the electronic communication, together with the sender/user’s data necessary to respond to requests as well as to provide the service. Specific summary information will be provided in relation to specific services.
Cookies are data files which some websites, while visited, can send to the user with the scope of tracing its path inside the site and collect data in anonymous form, in order to enhance the offer and the use of the site. The Company does not use information technology for the direct acquisition of personal data by which the user can be identified. Cookies for the transmission of personal information or systems for the tracing of users are not used. The Company uses so-called technical cookies only with the scope of rendering browsing the Site possible and to make it possible for the user to use its functions. Some technical cookies are necessary in order to optimize the use and have the user accredit itself with the Site, for example in order to enter a restricted area (so-called browser cookie). The browsing cookies are session cookies and are deactivated automatically once the browser is closed. For the installation of these cookies it is not necessary to collect the consent of the user. The Company uses furthermore analytic cookies of thirds parties by which information on the interaction of the visitor with the content of the Site is obtained (most frequently used pages, time of use, etc.) and which thereby provide statistic information which makes it possible to optimize the Site and to enhance its use.
Unless specified for surfing data, the user is free to provide personal information in the application forms or otherwise indicate them in order to request any information packs or other communications. Failure to provide personal information may, however, make it impossible to fulfill the request.
Personal data are processed by automated tools for the time necessary to achieve the purposes for which they were collected. Specific security measures have been taken to prevent loss of data, unlawful or incorrect use and unauthorized access.
The personal information provided by users who request dispatch of information packs or rendering of services is used only to provide the service requested and may be disclosed to Company’s employees and consultants, duly appointed as Persons in charge of processing, as well as third parties that render ancillary or instrumental services to the activity of the Company and which are appointed as Data Controllers. There will not be any other communication of data to third parties, except upon request of public authorities. The data collected will not be disseminated.
Data subjects are entitled, pursuant to Article 12 of the GDPR, to obtain, at any time, confirmation of the existence of the data and to know their origin, verify their accuracy or request their integration, updating or correction. Pursuant to this article data subjects shall have the right to request cancellation, anonymization or blocking of data processed in violation of the law, and in any case, to object on legitimate grounds to their processing. Requests should be sent to the Data Processor, at the above address or by email to