The Proposition of a PERSCAMME BASE ON MOUNCHES MANY INFARE unfounded or on reasons expressed through motifs inadmissibles (in the case species, appeal of praise ritual consistent in the mere contestation of the decision merit, in the absence of SIA reference to reasons of appeal of which in art. 829 cod. proc. civ.) puts in evidence the non -employment of the duty diligence and accuracy in the proposing the appeal itself and therefore integrates a hypothesis liability ex art. 96 cod. prosec.