Supreme Court, 4 March 2021, n. 6068

The clause compromise contained in the statute of company confiscated not is opposable nor to the national agency per the administration and the destination of the assets seized to crime organized, nor at the same company, expected the provision of ISCA not involves, not even in via indirect or mediated, the necessary consent to devolution in referees of the controversies, producing instead a alteration of the cause of the rappota social connotation from a publicistic fine of exceptional character and transient.