Arbitration case law

ordinanza

Supreme Court, 31 March 2022, n. 10473

Cassazione — II Civ.

Legal principle

In theme of appeal of the Lodo arbitration, the defect of motivation, which vice attributable to art. 829, n. 5, cod. Proc. civ., in report to art. 823, n. 3, same code, is recognizable only in the hypothesis in the motivation of the praise heats of the all or is a tal point lack from not allow the identification of the ratio of the decision adopted o, in other words, by denoting a process argumentative absolutely unacceptable on the plane dialectical, yes to be resolved in a non-motivation.

Methodological notes

standard

Decision text and analysis

In+theme+of+appeal+of the+Lodo+arbitration,+the+defect+of+motivation,+which+vice+attributable+to art.+829,+n.+5,+cod.+Proc.+ civ.,+in+report+to art.+823,+n.+3,+same+code,+is+recognizable+only+in the hypothesis+in++the+motivation+of the+praise+heats+ of the+all+or+is+a+tal+point+lack+from+not+allow+the identification+of the+ratio+of the+decision+adopted+o,+in+other words,+by+denoting+a+process+argumentative+absolutely unacceptable+on the+plane+dialectical,+yes+to be resolved+in+a+non-motivation.

How to cite

Cassazione — II Civ., 31 March 2022, No. 10473, «Supreme Court, 31 March 2022, n. 10473», in Arbitration in Italy, https://www.arbitratoinitalia.it/en/decisione/supreme-court-31-march-2022-n-10473-en-1752198536/

Share this decision