Supreme Court, 2 February 2025, n. 2474

The sanction of nullity of the praise containing provisions contradictory foreseen by art. 829, co. 1, n. 4, cod. Proc. Civ., And from today's art. 829, co. 1, n. 11, cod. Proc. Civ. , not corresponds a that of art. 360, co. 1, n. 5, cod. proc. civ., ma it is in the sense that said contradictory must be to emerge the different components of the device, o vvero between the motivation and the device, while the contradictory internal internal the different parts of the motivation, not expressly foreseen between i vices that involve the nulli tà of the praise, can assume relevance, which vice of the praise, only in what determines the impossibility absolute of reconstruct the logical iter and legal below to decision.