Legal principle
The challenge per nullity of a praise front to the court appeal is proposable, to senses of art. 828 of the Italian Civil Code proc., Only with reference to arbitrators rituals, while, in case of referee irreplace, the appeal aforementioned not it can be said admissible, being legitimately espireable the only action per (event) vices of the store, from propose with compliance of the rules ordinary on competence and of the double degree of jurisdiction. Quest o principle si applies also in the case in the appeal of the praise irritation is direct a to do the the nature ritual of the clause skilier.
Methodological notes
standard
Decision text and analysis
The challenge+per+nullity+of+a+praise+front+to the+court+appeal+is+proposable,+to+senses+of art.+828+of the Italian Civil Code+proc.,+Only+with+reference+to +arbitrators+rituals,+while,+in+case+of+referee+irreplace,+the appeal+aforementioned+not+it can be said+admissible,+being+legitimately+espireable+the+only +action+per+(event)+vices+of the+store,+from+propose+with+compliance+of the+rules+ordinary+on+competence+and+of the+double+degree+of+jurisdiction.+Quest o+principle+si+applies+also+in the+case+in++the appeal+of the+praise+irritation+is+direct+a+to do+the+the+nature+ritual+of the+clause+skilier.
How to cite
Cassazione — II Civ., 18 February 2016, No. 3197, «Supreme Court, 18 February 2016, n. 3197», in Arbitration in Italy, https://www.arbitratoinitalia.it/en/decisione/supreme-court-18-february-2016-n-3197-en-1752183022/