Arbitration case law

ordinanza

Supreme Court, 18 February 2016, n. 3197

Cassazione — II Civ.

Legal principle

The challenge per nullity of a praise front to the court appeal is proposable, to senses of art. 828 of the Italian Civil Code proc., Only with reference to arbitrators rituals, while, in case of referee irreplace, the appeal aforementioned not it can be said admissible, being legitimately espireable the only action per (event) vices of the store, from propose with compliance of the rules ordinary on competence and of the double degree of jurisdiction. Quest o principle si applies also in the case in the appeal of the praise irritation is direct a to do the the nature ritual of the clause skilier.

Methodological notes

standard

Decision text and analysis

The challenge+per+nullity+of+a+praise+front+to the+court+appeal+is+proposable,+to+senses+of art.+828+of the Italian Civil Code+proc.,+Only+with+reference+to +arbitrators+rituals,+while,+in+case+of+referee+irreplace,+the appeal+aforementioned+not+it can be said+admissible,+being+legitimately+espireable+the+only +action+per+(event)+vices+of the+store,+from+propose+with+compliance+of the+rules+ordinary+on+competence+and+of the+double+degree+of+jurisdiction.+Quest o+principle+si+applies+also+in the+case+in++the appeal+of the+praise+irritation+is+direct+a+to do+the+the+nature+ritual+of the+clause+skilier.

How to cite

Cassazione — II Civ., 18 February 2016, No. 3197, «Supreme Court, 18 February 2016, n. 3197», in Arbitration in Italy, https://www.arbitratoinitalia.it/en/decisione/supreme-court-18-february-2016-n-3197-en-1752183022/

Share this decision