Arbitration case law

sentenza

Court of Appeal of Venice, 11 January 2022, n. 25

Corte di Appello of Venezia

Legal principle

In the hypothesis in a part not fulfill spontaneously at own bond so as recognized by the referees in a procedure referee irrital, the other part, at the fine of to obtain the condemnation of the part defaulting e the consequent efficacy of title executive of the Statute contractual coming in being a followed of the judgment arbitration, must be carried out a normal action contractual of condemnation to the fulfillment founded precisely on the same contract.

Methodological notes

standard

Decision text and analysis

In the hypothesis+in++a+part+not+fulfill+spontaneously+at+own+bond+so+as+recognized+by the+referees+in+a+procedure+referee+irrital,+the other+part,+at the fine+of+to obtain+the+condemnation+of the+part+defaulting+e+the+ consequent+efficacy+of+title+executive+of the+Statute+contractual+coming+in+being+a+followed+of the+judgment+arbitration,+must be carried out+a+normal+action+contractual+of+condemnation+to the fulfillment+founded+precisely+on the same+contract.

How to cite

Corte di Appello of Venezia, 11 January 2022, No. 25, «Court of Appeal of Venice, 11 January 2022, n. 25», in Arbitration in Italy, https://www.arbitratoinitalia.it/en/decisione/court-of-appeal-of-venice-11-january-2022-n-25-en-1752161002/

Share this decision