Arbitration case law

sentenza

Court of Appeal of Turin, 6 September 2016, n. 1565

Corte di Appello of Torino

Legal principle

The forecast of the referral of a controversy to judgment of the referees involves a a derogation to jurisdiction ordinary, in case doubt of the clause impairment, must prefer Irsi one interpretation restrictive and affirmative of the jurisdiction state, recognizing itself not return the application in contestation in the area of the subject remittance to referees.

Methodological notes

standard

Decision text and analysis

The+forecast+of the+referral+of+a+controversy+to+judgment+of the+referees+involves a+a+derogation+to+jurisdiction+ordinary,+in+case+doubt+of the+clause+impairment,+must+prefer Irsi+one+interpretation+restrictive+and+affirmative+of the+jurisdiction+state,+recognizing itself+not+return+the+application+in+contestation+in the area+of the+subject+remittance+to+referees.

How to cite

Corte di Appello of Torino, 6 September 2016, No. 1565, «Court of Appeal of Turin, 6 September 2016, n. 1565», in Arbitration in Italy, https://www.arbitratoinitalia.it/en/decisione/court-of-appeal-of-turin-6-september-2016-n-1565-en-1752156987/

Share this decision