Arbitration case law

sentenza

Court of Appeal of Palermo, 12 February 2021, n. 167

Corte di Appello of Palermo

Legal principle

The complaint of nullity of the praise referee postula, in
how much anchored to elements ascertained by referees, the explicit allegation of the erroneity of the fee of right applied compared to called elements, and not it is therefore, therefore, proposable in connection with L A Mera Deduction of Japanese Investigation and of motivation, which could highlight non -compliance of law only at the outcome of the refreshment of the omitted or inadequate exam of circumstances of character decisive character.

Methodological notes

standard

Decision text and analysis

The+complaint+of+nullity+of the+praise+referee+postula,+in
how much+anchored+to+elements+ascertained+by+referees,+the explicit+allegation+of the erroneity+of the+fee+of+right+applied+compared+to+called+elements,+and+not+it is therefore, therefore,+proposable+in+connection+with+L A+Mera+Deduction+of+Japanese+Investigation+and+of+motivation,+which could+highlight+non -compliance+of+law+only+at the outcome+of the+refreshment+of the omitted+or+inadequate+exam+of+circumstances+of+character+decisive character.

How to cite

Corte di Appello of Palermo, 12 February 2021, No. 167, «Court of Appeal of Palermo, 12 February 2021, n. 167», in Arbitration in Italy, https://www.arbitratoinitalia.it/en/decisione/court-of-appeal-of-palermo-12-february-2021-n-167-en-1752159010/

Share this decision