Arbitration case law

ordinanza

Supreme Court, 8 November 2022, n. 32838

Cassazione — I Civ.

Legal principle

The judgment of appeal of the Lodo arbitration has per object only the verification of the legitimacy of the decision yield by the referees, not the review of the issues merit ad they submitted, so that the assessment in fact made from the referees, which is the one concerning the interpretation of the contract object of the contender, not it is censurable in the judgment of appeal of the praise, Salvo that the motivation on the point is completely missed oD absolute efforting.

Methodological notes

standard

Decision text and analysis

The+judgment+of+appeal+of the+Lodo+arbitration+has+per+object+only+the+verification+of the+legitimacy+of the+decision+yield+by the+referees,+not+the+review+of the+issues+merit+ad+they submitted,+so that the assessment+in+fact+made+ from the+referees,+which+is the one+concerning+the interpretation+of the+contract+object+of the contender,+not+it is+censurable+in the+judgment+of+appeal+of the+praise,+Salvo+that+the+motivation+on the+point+is+completely+missed+oD+absolute+efforting.

How to cite

Cassazione — I Civ., 8 November 2022, No. 32838, «Supreme Court, 8 November 2022, n. 32838», in Arbitration in Italy, https://www.arbitratoinitalia.it/en/decisione/supreme-court-8-november-2022-n-32838-en-1752200300/

Share this decision