Supreme Court, 7 February 2025, n. 3175

Consistently with le rules that superintendo to memories for cassation of the error hermeneutic, the one who is challenging the praise must specific re i canons in concrete violated, as well as the point and the way in the referee si it is from they are discostate, not being a simple critici Ca of the decision unfavorable, formulated through the mera prospect of one different (E more favorable for self) interpretation compared to adopted by the judge, translating this in the request a new assessment of fact, inadmissible in a judgment.