Arbitration case law

ordinanza

Supreme Court, 6 November 2015, n. 22748

Cassazione — VI Civ.

Legal principle

Ai senses of art. 819-ter code proc. Civ. The exception of arbitration must be proposal, a penalty of forfeiture, in the appearance of response. The lack a specific specification indication in order at term within the the exception it must be raised Reference to the discipline general dictated by art. 38 cod. proc. civ., the which it has that incompetence, both subject and for value or per territory, must be subject to exceptional, a penalty of forfeiture, in the appearance response promptly deposited.

Methodological notes

standard

Decision text and analysis

Ai+senses+of art.+819-ter+code+proc.+Civ.+The exception+of+arbitration+must be+proposal,+a+penalty+of+forfeiture,+in the+appearance+of+response.+The+lack+a+specific+specification+indication+in+order at+term+within+the+the exception+it must be+raised+ +Reference+to the+discipline+general+dictated+by art.+38+cod.+proc.+civ.,+the+which it has+that+incompetence,+both+subject and+for+value+or+per+territory,+must be subject to exceptional,+a+penalty+of+forfeiture,+in the+appearance+response+promptly+deposited.

How to cite

Cassazione — VI Civ., 6 November 2015, No. 22748, «Supreme Court, 6 November 2015, n. 22748», in Arbitration in Italy, https://www.arbitratoinitalia.it/en/decisione/supreme-court-6-november-2015-n-22748-en-1752182410/

Share this decision