The notion of contradictory nature which does reference the art. 829, co. 1, n. 11 cod. Proc. Civ. Not corresponds a of which to the previous art. 360, co. 1, n. 5, cod. Proc. Civ., But goes understanding in the sense that the contrast must emerge between the different components of the device, or between the motivation and the device, the the internal contradiction between the different parts of the motivation, not expressly foreseen between i vices which involve the nullity of the praise, can assume relevance, which vice of the praise, only in de Terms the impossibility absolute of reconstruct the logical and legal process below to the decision per total absence a a motivation attributable to its model functional.