Arbitration case law

ordinanza

Supreme Court, 30 July 2020, n. 16408

Cassazione — I Civ.

Legal principle

While, from a side, competent to decide on the issues relative to validity of the compromise or of the praise and on the regularity of the appointment deg Li Referees, Ai senses of art. 829 of the Italian Civil Code civ., is only the judge of the appeal of the praise, on the other side each question, relative the Law of the referee of receive the payment of the honor, one time carried out the assignment conferred in the area of the ratio mandate intercurrent with the parts, compete to the president of the court, to which, of against, is not it is allowed no investigation on the validity and efficacy of the .

Methodological notes

standard

Decision text and analysis

While,+from+a+side,+competent+to+decide+on the+issues+relative+to+validity+of the+compromise+or+of the+praise+and+on the+regularity+of the+appointment+deg Li+Referees,+Ai+senses+of art.+829+of the Italian Civil Code+civ.,+is+only+the+judge+of the appeal+of the+praise,+on the other+side+each+question,+relative+the+ Law+of the referee+of+receive+the+payment+of the honor,+one+time+carried out+the assignment+conferred+in the area+of the+ratio+mandate+intercurrent+with+the+parts,+compete+to the+president+of the+court, to which,+of+against,+is not+it is allowed+no+investigation+on the+validity+and+efficacy+of the+.

How to cite

Cassazione — I Civ., 30 July 2020, No. 16408, «Supreme Court, 30 July 2020, n. 16408», in Arbitration in Italy, https://www.arbitratoinitalia.it/en/decisione/supreme-court-30-july-2020-n-16408-en-1752192758/

Share this decision