Supreme Court, 30 December 2021, n. 42049

Therefore, provised in the forms of which to articles 816 ss. cod. proc. civ., the appeal of the pit, even if direct a to do the nature nature of the arbitrator and consequent error in proceed committed from The referees, it goes proposal front to courtyard of appeal to senses of the articles 827 ss. cod. proc. civ. and not in the proper of the appeal of the praise irreplace, ie in front to judge ordinarily competent. to Effects of identification of the half with the praise it goes challenged, this that matters, in fact, it is the nature of the act in concrete place in being from referees, more that the nature of the arbitration as expected parts; Therefore, if it is state pronounced a praise ritual despite the the parts they had a a arbitration irrital, nor it follows that that praise it is challengeable exclusively to the senses of the articles 827 ss. cod. proc. civ.