Supreme Court, 3 December 2021, n. 38200

The complaint of nullity of the Lodo referee postula, in as much as anchored elements ascertained by the referees, the explicit allegation of the erroneity of the fee of right applied compared to called elements, and not is, therefore, , proposo. nibible in connection with the mera deduction of gaps investigation and of motivation, which could highlight non -compliance law only at the outcome of the feedback of the omitted or inadequate exam of circumstances of character decisive character.