The decision of the judge ordinary that affirm or neghi the existence o the validity of a arbitration irrital and that therefore, in the first case, not pronouncements on the dispute declaring that it must have place the place the arbitration irritual e, in the second, declares the decision of the judge ordinary can have place, not is susceptible of appeal with the regulation of competence, in the the agbit of the arbitration irrital determines the inapplicability of all the rules dictates per the ritual, including art. 819-ter.