Supreme Court, 22 June 2023, n. 17902

To the effects of identification of the half with which the praise it goes challenged, this that matters is the nature of the act in concrete place in being from referees, more that the nature of the arbitrator as expected parts; p; p Er, if it is state pronounced a praise ritual despite the parts they had a arbitration irritation, nor nor does it follow that praise it is challengeable exclusively to senses of the articles 827 e ss. cod. proc. civ.