In theme of civil liability of the referees, is manifestly unfounded the question of constitutional legitimacy, per violation of the articles 3 and 24 cost., Of art. 813-ter, co. 4, cod. Proc. Civ., In part in which, subordinability tion of liability per prior acceptance of the appeal of the praise with sentence passata in judged, not includes the liability of the referees errors of fact or of right being vices that not legitimize the appeal of the praise, not they ndo nominable one unreasonable disparity of treatment compared to discipline foreseen per the liability of the magistrates, nor the violation of the right act in judgment, expected not homogeneity of the disciplines post office a comparison place A per the arbitration it enjoys a consistent plus respect to chi acts in front of the judge, so it is not it appears unreasonable, which balance, the not contestability of the praise per determined profiles, si si reconnect the limit liability of the referees.