Site icon Arbitration in Italy

Supreme Court, 14 July 2023, n. 20209

In+theme+of+appeal+of the+Lodo+per+violation+of the+rules+of+right+on+merit+of the+dispute,+art.+829,+co.+3,+cod.+Proc.+C IV.,+like+reformulated+by art.+24+of+Legislative Decree+n.+40+of+2006,+si+applies,+to+senses+of the+provision+transitory+of which+in art.+27+d Ello+himself+decree,+a+all+I+judgments+referee+promoted+after+the entrance+in+vigor+of the+Novella+(2+March+2006).+However,+per+stable re+if+is+admissible+such+appeal,+the+law,+a+to which+art.+829,+co.+3,+cod.+proc.+civ.+refers,+must be+identified+in+that that +current+at the+moment+of the+stipulation+of the+convention+of+arbitration,+so,+in+case+procedure+arbitration+activated+after+the entrance+in+vigor+of the+new+discipline+-+ma in+force+of+convention+stipulated+frontly+-+silence+of the+parts+is+the AR+the AR+ t.+829,+co.+2,+Cod.+proc.+civ.+in the+text+previous,+that+admits+the appeal+of the+praise+per+violation+of the+rules+inherent+per+merit ,+Salvo+che+the+parts+themselves+had+authorized+the+referees+a+judge+second+equity+or+had+declared+the+praise+not+contestable.

Exit mobile version