The sanction of nullity foreseen by art. 829, first paragraph, n. 11, cod. Proc. Civ. Not corresponds a of art. 360, first paragraph, n. 5, cod. Proc. Civ., Ma it is in s in s ENSO that said contradictory nature must emerge between the different components of the device, or between the motivation and the device, while the contradictory internal between the different parts of the motivation, not expressly foreseen between i vices which involve the nullity of the praise, can assume relevance, which vice of the praise, only in as debt RMini the impossibility absolute of reconstruct the logical and legal process below to the decision per total absence one motivation attributable to its model functional.