The decision of the judge ordinary, che affirm or neghi the existence or the validity of a arbitration irritation, and which, therefore, in the first case not pronouncements on the dispute declaring that it must have having place the arbitration e in the second declare, instead, the decision Iudice ordinary can have place, not it is susceptible of appeal with the regulation of competence, in the the agbit agbitrate irrital determines the inapplicability of all the dictated rules per that ritual, including the art. 819-ter. prosec.