The relevant error per the pronunciation of disability of the praise irritual must concern the perception, from part of the referees, of the elements of the data of fact subordinate to their exam from subjects who stipulated the compromise e not, instead, the them determinations, place that them not express one proper will negotiale, but damage content to of the parts. from this drift that not assumes relief the deviation inherent to The evaluation of a reality i which elements have been states from they exactly perceived i.e. the c.d. error of evaluation or of judgment, relating to conviction rendered by referees in outcome evaluation of the elele minds acquired, i.e. the errors of right concerning the same discipline applicable to the case concrete per the resolution of the dispute. per to which, the praise irrital not is challengeable for error s in iudicando.