The first period of art. 819-ter, co. 1, cod. Proc. Civ., In the providing that the competence of the referees not is excluding from the connection between the dispute ad they deferita and a pendant in front to He says ordinary, implies, in reference to the hypothesis in it is it was proposed a plurality of questions, that the subsistence of the competence referee is verified with specific regard a each of them, not being able to donate to referees (or to the judge ordinary) the entire controversy in virtue of the mere bond of connection; therefore, where the questions connected not diano place a litisconsorzio necessary, the accommodation chin of the regulation of competence involves the separation of the causes, well I can it i judgments continue ahead to different judges in reason of the derogability and availability of the rules in theme of competence.