Arbitration case law

sentenza

Court of Turin, 14 March 2016, n. 1444

Tribunale of Torino

Legal principle

The referee irrital constitutes a institute atypical, derogatory of the institute typical regulated from the law and churning out of the guarantees to this purpose by the legislator; therefore, in lack a will derogation clearly derived from compromise SSO O from the clause skuser, the reference of the parts to the solution of determined controversies to the arbitration normally constitutes expression of the will will reference reference to the institute typical arbitration regulated from the code of ritual.

Methodological notes

standard

Decision text and analysis

The referee+irrital+constitutes+a+institute+atypical,+derogatory+of the institute+typical+regulated+from the+law+and+churning out+of the+guarantees+to this purpose+by the+legislator;+therefore,+in+lack+a+will+derogation+clearly+derived+from+compromise SSO+O+from the+clause+skuser,+the+reference+of the+parts+to the+solution+of+determined+controversies+to the arbitration+normally+constitutes+expression+of the+will+will+reference+reference+to the institute+typical+arbitration+regulated+from the+code+of+ritual.

How to cite

Tribunale of Torino, 14 March 2016, No. 1444, «Court of Turin, 14 March 2016, n. 1444», in Arbitration in Italy, https://www.arbitratoinitalia.it/en/decisione/court-of-turin-14-march-2016-n-1444-en-1752166801/

Share this decision