Legal principle
The Lodo referee irrital, beyond che for specifications hypotheses provided by art. 808-ter of the Italian Civil Code civ., Per its nature, quoad ad effectum, negotiation, being face ad integrate a event of will negotiating with function replacement of the of the parts in conflict, and per they binding, it is contestable only for i vices that can vulnerare each event will will negotiale.
Methodological notes
standard
Decision text and analysis
The+Lodo+referee+irrital,+beyond+che+for+specifications+hypotheses+provided+by art.+808-ter+of the Italian Civil Code+civ.,+Per+its+nature,+quoad+ad+effectum,+negotiation,+being+face+ad+integrate+a+event +of+will+negotiating+with+function+replacement+of+the+of the+parts+in+conflict,+and+per+they+binding,+it is+contestable+only+for+i+vices+that can+vulnerare+each+event+will+will+negotiale.
How to cite
Tribunale of Piacenza, 3 June 2019, No. 332, «Court of Piacenza, 3 June 2019, n. 332», in Arbitration in Italy, https://www.arbitratoinitalia.it/en/decisione/court-of-piacenza-3-june-2019-n-332-en-1752169258/