Arbitration case law

sentenza

Court of Perugia, 17 July 2020, n. 819

Tribunale of Perugia

Legal principle

Since in the arbitration irrital the parts they mean entrust the referee the solution a a controversy through one strictly negotiating tool, with this by engaging to consider the decision of the referees as expression t t Ale personnel will, adverse the decision arbitration is legitimately espireable the action of cancellation by propose with compliance of the ordinary rules on competence, for subject and territory, and double degree of jurisdiction.

Methodological notes

standard

Decision text and analysis

Since+in the arbitration+irrital+the+parts+they mean+entrust+the referee+the+solution+a+a+controversy+through+one+strictly+negotiating tool,+with+this+by engaging+to+consider+the+decision+of the+referees+as+expression+t+t Ale+personnel+will,+adverse+the+decision+arbitration+is+legitimately+espireable+the action+of+cancellation+by+propose+with+compliance+of the+ordinary rules+on+competence,+for+subject+and+territory,+and+double+degree+of+jurisdiction.

How to cite

Tribunale of Perugia, 17 July 2020, No. 819, «Court of Perugia, 17 July 2020, n. 819», in Arbitration in Italy, https://www.arbitratoinitalia.it/en/decisione/court-of-perugia-17-july-2020-n-819-en-1752171649/

Share this decision