Arbitration case law

sentenza

Court of Florence, 21 March 2016, n. 1129

Tribunale of Firenze

Legal principle

Although providing art. 2533 of the Italian Civil Code that against the resolution of exclusion the member may propose opposition to the court, in the term sixty sixties days communication of such resolution, this not excludes what what the parts can donate ad referees the resolution of such controversy, in what the area of the not compromise is restricted to the absolutable unavailability of the right and therefore at sun nullity incurable.

Methodological notes

standard

Decision text and analysis

Although providing+art.+2533+of the Italian Civil Code+that+against+the+resolution+of+exclusion+the+member+may propose+opposition+to the+court,+in the+term+sixty+sixties+days+communication+of+such+resolution,+this+not+excludes+what what +the+parts+can+donate+ad+referees+the+resolution+of+such+controversy,+in+what+the area+of the+not+compromise+is+restricted+to the absolutable+unavailability+of the+right+and+therefore+at+sun+nullity+incurable.

How to cite

Tribunale of Firenze, 21 March 2016, No. 1129, «Court of Florence, 21 March 2016, n. 1129», in Arbitration in Italy, https://www.arbitratoinitalia.it/en/decisione/court-of-florence-21-march-2016-n-1129-en-1752166827/

Share this decision