Arbitration case law

sentenza

Court of Cuneo, 15 March 2022, n. 262

Tribunale of Cuneo

Legal principle

The existence of one clause skuser not excludes the competence of the judge ordinary ad emit a decree injunction (expected that the discipline of the procedure arbitral not it contemplates the emission of measures unheard of altera part and the exception of c C OMPRUMESSO not is detectable ex officio), ma imposes a the latter, in case subsequent opposition opposition on the existence of the said clause, the declaration of nullity of the opposite decree and the contextual remission of the controversy to the judgment.

Methodological notes

standard

Decision text and analysis

The existence+of+one+clause+skuser+not+excludes+the+competence+of the+judge+ordinary+ad+emit+a+decree+injunction+(expected+that+the+discipline+of the procedure+arbitral+not+it contemplates+the emission+of+measures+unheard of+altera+part+and+the exception+of+c+C OMPRUMESSO+not+is+detectable+ex officio),+ma+imposes+a+the latter,+in+case+subsequent+opposition+opposition+on the existence+of the+said+clause,+the+declaration+of+nullity+of the+opposite decree+and+the+contextual+remission+of the+controversy+to the+judgment.

How to cite

Tribunale of Cuneo, 15 March 2022, No. 262, «Court of Cuneo, 15 March 2022, n. 262», in Arbitration in Italy, https://www.arbitratoinitalia.it/en/decisione/court-of-cuneo-15-march-2022-n-262-en-1752176053/

Share this decision