Court of Appeal of Venice, 7 June 2021, n. 1656

In theme of arbitration, the penalty of nullity foreseen by art. 829, co. 1, n. 4, cod. Proc. Civ., Per the praise containing provisions contradictory not corresponds a that of art. 360, c o. 1, n. 5, cod. proc. civ., ma it is understanding in the sense that dictates contradictory must emerge between different components of the device or between the motivation and the device, the C C ONTRADDITITITY INTERNAL between the different parts of the motivation, not expressly foreseen between i vices that involve the nullity of the praise, can assume relevance, which vice vice, solant o in what determines the impossibility absolute of reconstruct the logical process and legal below to decision per total absence a motivation attributable to its functional model.