Court of Appeal of Venice, 19 October 2021, n. 2652

The obligation of exposure summary of the reasons of the decision imposed to the referees by art. 823, n. 5, cod. Proc. Civ., The which is missing compliance o determines the possibility of challenge the praise ai senses of art. 829, co. 1, nn. 4 and 5, cod. proc. civ., can be considered dissatisfied only O the motivation miss of the all or is so much lacking from not not to understand understand the logical process that has determined the decision referee or contain contradictions irreconcilable in the body of the motivation or of the device such to make incomprehensible the ratio of the decision.