Arbitration case law

sentenza

Court of Appeal of Venice, 16 March 2016, n. 586

Corte di Appello of Venezia

Legal principle

In virtue of the principle of autonomy of the clause compromise, it has an individuality clearly distinct from the contract in which is it is , not constituting a a accessory. Nor ue che the nullity of the shop substantial not it overwhelms, per drag, the clause compromise in it is contained, remaining put to referees the assessment of the deduced invalidity.

Methodological notes

standard

Decision text and analysis

In+virtue+of the+principle+of+autonomy+of the+clause+compromise,+it has+an individuality+clearly+distinct+from the+contract+in+which is+it is+,+not+constituting a+a+accessory.+Nor+ ue+che+the+nullity+of the+shop+substantial+not+it overwhelms,+per+drag,+the+clause+compromise+in+it is contained,+remaining+put+to+referees+the assessment+of the+deduced+invalidity.

How to cite

Corte di Appello of Venezia, 16 March 2016, No. 586, «Court of Appeal of Venice, 16 March 2016, n. 586», in Arbitration in Italy, https://www.arbitratoinitalia.it/en/decisione/court-of-appeal-of-venice-16-march-2016-n-586-en-1752156306/

Share this decision