Not each violation of rules procedural assumes the value of violation of the right of defense, expected that the hypothesis of refusal recognition and execution of praise foreigner previ is from art. 840, co. 3, n. 2 cod. proc. civ., consistent in the impossibility of to do the proper defense in the procedure referee, not is made per the only fact that a part part artoral provision procedural, current in the legal system foreigner and applicable in the case, it is it was violated, being instead it is necessary that is it is checked the aforementioned impo Ssitability of defense, vice versa configurating only a a vice of the procedure arbitral, from to do , if anything, in the system foreigner and with i vehicles challenge from the one foreseen.