Court of Appeal of Rome, 5 July 2022, n. 4636

The sanction of nullity foreseen by art. 829, co. 1, n. 11, cod. Proc. Civ. Per the praise containing provisions contradictory not corresponds a of art. 360, co. 1, n. 5, cod. proc. civ., ma it goes understanding in the sense that said contradictory nature must emerge between the different components of the device, or between the motivation and the device, while the contradicted Ratà internal between the different parts of the motivation, not expressly foreseen between i vices which involve the nullity of the praise, can assume relevance, which vice of the praise, only q Uento determines the impossibility absolute of reconstruct the logical process and legal below to decision per total absence a a motivation attributable to its model functional model.