Court of Appeal of Rome, 19 July 2023, n. 5232

The sanction of nullity foreseen by art. 829, co. 1, n. 11, cod. Proc. Civ. For the praise containing provisions contradictory not corresponds a of art. 360, co. 1, n. 5, cod. Pro c. civ. (previgent), but it goes understanding in the sense that said contradictory (must be checked between different components of the device, or between the motivation and the device, the the conton Addettorie internal between the different parts of the motivation, not expressly foreseen between i vices which involve the nullity of the praise, can assume relevance, which vice vice, only In what determines the impossibility absolute of reconstruct the logical process and legal below to decision per total absence a motivation attributable to its functional model.