Arbitration case law

sentenza

Court of Appeal of Naples, 24 February 2025, n. 886

Corte di Appello of Napoli

Legal principle

If the Lodo Arbitration not is pronounced in the term of to which in art. 820 cod. Proc. Civ., Looms on the part affected the burden of notify to referees, after the deadline of the term and before of the pronunciation praise, the dot d I Far The Decadence of which to the mentioned art. 820, stop, still, the principle of character general character, that the part can always attribute such faculty ad a proper representative, which the defender, as long as it is to the same special prosecutor.

Methodological notes

standard

Decision text and analysis

If+the+Lodo+Arbitration+not+is pronounced+in the+term+of+to which+in art.+820+cod.+Proc.+Civ.,+Looms+on the+part+affected+the burden+of+notify+to+referees,+after+the+deadline+of the+term+and+before+of the+pronunciation+praise,+the+dot+d I+Far+The+Decadence+of which+to the+mentioned+art.+820,+stop,+still,+the+principle of+character+general character,+that+the+part+can always+attribute+such+faculty+ad+a+proper+representative,+which+the+defender,+as long as it is+to the same+special prosecutor.

How to cite

Corte di Appello of Napoli, 24 February 2025, No. 886, «Court of Appeal of Naples, 24 February 2025, n. 886», in Arbitration in Italy, https://www.arbitratoinitalia.it/en/decisione/court-of-appeal-of-naples-24-february-2025-n-886-en-1752212731/

Share this decision