The sanction of nullity foreseen by art. 829, n. 11, cod. Proc. Civ., Per the pit containing provisions contradictory, not corresponds at all a that of art. 360, n. 5, cod. Pro c. civ., n. 5, ma is agreement from doctrine and jurisprudence in the sense that said contradictory (must emerge between different components of the device; between the motivation and the dispos Osterivo, while the contradictory nature between the different parts of the motivation, not expressly foreseen between i vices which involve the nullity of the praise, can assume relevance only q Uento determines the impossibility absolute of reconstruct the logical process and legal below to decision per total absence a a motivation attributable to its model functional model.