Court of Appeal of Milan, 26 August 2022, n. 2769

In theme of appeal of the Lodo arbitration, the defect of motivation, which vice attributable to art. 829, n. 5, cod. Proc. civ., in report to art. 823, n. 3, same code, is recognizable only in the hypothesis in the motivation of the praise heats of the all or is a tal point lack from not allow the identification of the ratio of the decision adopted o, in other words, by denoting a process argumentative absolutely unacceptable on the plane dialectical, yes to be resolved in a non-motivation.
Art. 829, n. 11, Cod. Proc. Civ. Provides the nullity of the praise not per case mere case contradictory (between various points of the motivation o of insufficiency of the itself, but only when they exist contradiction more s s s s Tatuitions of the device, or a contradiction between motivation and device that si translates in the impossibility of understand the ratio decidendi of the decision, equivalent ad a substantial deficiency absolute of motivation.