The Lodo referee irrital per the its nature, quoad effectum, negotiation, being face a integrate a event will will negotiale with function substitute the part of part i in conflict, e per esse binding, it is challengeable only for i vices that can vulnerare each event will will negotiale. therefore, the error of the judgment arbitration, per e SSSER Relevant, second the forecast of art. 1428 COD. civ., must be substantial - or essential - recognizable - articles 1429 and 1431 cod. civ. - and , second the consolidated Orientation jurisprudential, must be the referees income in a false representation or altered perception of the elements of fact determined by having deemed existing ago tti che certainly not the are and vice versa, or contested facts that such are not - similarly to the error revocation contemplated, per i measures jurisdictional, by art. 3 95 n. 4 code proc. Civ. - while not detects the error of the referees which pertaining to determination from they adopted in base to conviction reached after having interpreted ED examinat o the elements acquired, ibid including i criteria of evaluation indicated by the parts, because they them, in give content to will parts parts, expresses an activity interpretative e not perceptive, which is transfonde in the judgment them entrusted and which, for will of the themselves, is incontrovertible, although it is a shop stipulated via i respective referees-dashermas.