Supreme Court, 7 July 2016, n. 13954

If it is state pronounced a praise irrital despite that some of the parts they support have, in reality, agreed a clause per arbitration ritual, the praise itself it must be challenged, it is also to the purpose of to do the ritual character O itself, not before to courtyard of appeal, a rule of art. 828 cod. proc. civ., ma in base at rules ordinary on competence and with compliance of the double degree of jurisdiction, to be worth i vices vizi of the will.