n. 4 cod. proc. civ. (now art. 829 n. 5 cod. proc. civ., per deficiency of the requirement of which in art. 823 n. 5 cod. proc. , exposure summary of the reasons), it is stated recognized only in the hypothesis in the motivation of the praise miss of the all That is it is a tal point lack from not allow the identification of the ratio of the decision adopted o, in other words, by denoting a iTer argumentative absolutely unacceptable on the floor dialectical, yes to be resolved in a not motivation.