Supreme Court, 5 July 2016, n. 13688

Although the Constitutional Corte has declared the Constitutional illegitimacy of art. 819-ter, co. 2, cod. Proc. Civ., In part in which it excludes the applicability, to relationships between arbitration and process, of rules corresponding in art. 50 co d. proc. civ., it is true that the sentence declaration of the unproponability of the question, because donated to the cognition of the referees, not binds these the last as to the legal existence and validity of the clause compromise.