Supreme Court, 5 August 2016, n. 16537
Legal Principle
The admissibility of the complaint of nullity of the praise arbitration per non -compliance of rules of right in iudicando is circumscribed within i same borders of the violation of Law opposable with the appeal per cassation ex art. 360 n.3 cod. proc. civ. such complaint, in anchored to elements ascertained by referees, postula the attic ne explicit of the erroneity of the fee of right applied compared to called elements, and not is, therefore therefore, proposable in connection with the mere deduction of gap of ind Agea e of motivation, which could highlight non -compliance with law only at the outcome of the feedback of the omitted or inadequate exam of circumstances of character decisive.
Methodological Notes
standard