ordinanza
No. 18507
Year: 2020

Supreme Court, 4 September 2020, n. 18507

⚖️ Cassazione - VI Civ.
📅

Legal Principle

At the fine of establish if si verses or less in hypothesis of praise that decides partially the merit of the controversy you need to have about to verification of the exhaustion of the function jurisdiction in front of to referees, by guisa , per i fin of the immediate contestability, it must be considered praise partial, despite the formula adopted by the norm, also which, although without to reach to the ballot of the merit, it has nonndimeno exhausted the function decis Oria donated per college arbitration: e therefore, ad example, in hypothesis cumulation of questions, the praise that has decisive on the competence referee about ad one of they will be to consider praise partial (i. E. immediately imp Ugnabile) where the college referee si is in part here changing of the lite, it will be to consider praise not definitive (i.e. contestable only with definitive) where the college referee has it recognized the own competence.

Methodological Notes

standard

How to cite

Cassazione, 04/09/2020, n. 18507, in Arbitrato in Italia, https://www.arbitratoinitalia.it/en/decisione/supreme-court-4-september-2020-n-18507-en-1752192784/