The challenge per nullity of the praise referee must be notified to the part personally, not at the person that has it defense in the procedure arbit traile, even if cumulando in said headquarters the clothes of domicilious, while remains at about irrelevant that said defender is a legal enabled to the air cizio of the profession, or is also equipped of prosecutor, always with election of home, per the declaration executive of the praise or per the intimation de L precept ED the promotion of the execution forced, being able the election of domicile concern the notification of the appeal per nullity of the praise sol o if contained in the compromise or in the clause compromise, in ratio at traceability of said appeal at ratio or affair per the which yes it is agreed the appeal ad referees, not even when it is accessory to the assignment defensive per the procedure referee or per I subsequent moments of the session Cutivity and Execution of the Lodo, Expected which, in these last hypothesis, the one notification is act foreign and external to tasks of the agent - domicile ARIO, Given the diversification e the separation of the procedure of formation and implementation of the praise compared to the judgment addressed to denounce the nullity.