Supreme Court, 21 June 2021, n. 17645

The sanction of nullity foreseen by art. 829, co. 1, n. 11, cod. Proc. Civ. Not corresponds a of art. 360, co. 1, n. 5, cod. Proc. Civ., Ma it is intended in the sense . Said contradictory nature must emerge between the different components of the device, or between the motivation ED the device, while the contradictory internal between divet If parts of the motivation, not expressly foreseen between i vices that they involve the nullity of the praise, can assume relevance, which vice of the praise, only in what detects ni the impossibility absolute of reconstruct the logical iter and legal below to decision per total absence a a motivation attributable to its functional model.