In the hypothesis of revocation of praise per willful misconduct of one part in damage of the other, ex articles 831 and 395, co. 1, n. 1, cod. Proc. Civ., The term peremptory o to propose it, thirty days, starts, to senses of art. 326 cod. proc. civ., from the discovery of the willful misconduct, although it must be discovery effects effects va e complete, recognizable only when you si is acquired the reasonable certainty - not being the mere suspicion - the malice vi is stat O ED has deceived the referee, up to to determine states different from those that would be were adopted to conclusion of a debate corrected.