With regard ad a contract of lease, per to which it is expected in strength of clause compromise the cognition of referees the relative controversies, this limit in the procedure of validation of eviction, per to which exists the competence functional and mandatory of the judge state as much as to the phase of cognition summary which is it concludes with a pronunciation of validation (art. 66 3 Cod. Proc. Civ.) Or with the order provisional of release (art. 665 cod. Proc. Civ.), So that, when it is proposal opposition from part of the ethics conductor and the special process si is transformed into ordinary process of cognition, not there is no foreclosure per the deferibility to referees of this second phase of the procedure in implementation of the clause compromise.